Главная страница
Конфиденциальность
Информация для авторов
Наши контакты

НОВЫЕ ФИЛЬМЫ И СЕРИАЛЫ ОБНОВЛЕНО СЕГОДНЯ

 





Формат Размер Скачать

Информация о видео


Название :  
Продолжительность :  
Пользователь :  id 908967285464
Дата публикации :   ript src=
Просмотры :   layer\/9383995e\/www-embed-player.vflset\/www-embed-player.js
Понравилось :   1,499
Не понравилось :   41


Кадры из видео




Комментарии к видео



@alanfearon6568
I agree on some points but the CW beats the Omega, Tudor and Rolex on a number of specifications.
Комментарий от : @alanfearon6568


@Kilitsizkilit
I've just discovered your channel and watched a few of your videos. I can't believe how accurate and honest your reviews are. I'm going to watch a lot of watch reviews from your channel. I'm about to buy a Tissot PRS 516 model watch. Could you please tell me if am i doing a mistake? The watch is TİSSOT PRS 516 POWERMATİC 80 T131.430.11.042.00
Комментарий от : @Kilitsizkilit


@winduncan9818
I don't really think that's good value for a 15mm thick collared GMT. I'd much rather get a Mido "true GMT" for less or pony up to a Zulu time.
Комментарий от : @winduncan9818


@muffemod
Better value for sure.
Комментарий от : @muffemod


@weeleung6043
Is it a true Gmt?
Комментарий от : @weeleung6043


@tipsytaverner7692
No I micro brand... idiot and don’t record in this light ever again.
Комментарий от : @tipsytaverner7692


@lloydyoung571
Thanks for the info but lume shot would've been useful - is the bezel lumed?
Комментарий от : @lloydyoung571


@LCRider13
CW is a phenomenal brand. The C60 Elite 1000 is 15.4mm thick and is much more doable in its wearability. Plus , I love that there are no middle men. You can only buy from them. Definitely helps with the value and the resale .
Комментарий от : @LCRider13


@Tonysoprano497
It’s a fantastic watch at the price however 16 mm is too thick . I would rather it was 14 mm and 500 m the gimmicky 1000m means nothing really . Slim it down get rid of the exhibition caseback and have a non cosc variant at around 1200 pounds it would be very appealing...
Комментарий от : @Tonysoprano497


@keithlau0709
Hope to see your video comparing other dive watch with this... Great work
Комментарий от : @keithlau0709


@jacobelx5841
Everything I wanted in a diver watch!
Комментарий от : @jacobelx5841


@rodsalvador3608
Oof that's a tall watch
Комментарий от : @rodsalvador3608


@RollsRoyceSilverSpur
Thank you for this video. This watch is currently my favorite among all other CW watches . I think you must be first to ever feature this cool watch in Youtube as well .There's also something which I think CW should improve in bracelet wise .No, it's not squeaks . I have owned Rolex watches and all of them could make some squeaks .Those squeaks is reminiscent of a new car smell in a sense. Well, my main complaint about the bracelet is that CW doesn't use screws to secure the links but use pins .
This very watch and CW ,in general , makes more attractive watches than Omega to me .However, Omega is making more quality watches and not to mention history of Omega in the horological venue . I believe there's still people who doesn't know what a CW is but everyone knows what an Omega is .

Комментарий от : @RollsRoyceSilverSpur


@chrisjones6439
First off, enjoyed your review.
However, to compare this with Tudor, Omega, Rolex etc is a bit redundant.
Actually getting a tad fed up with hearing it...
The play on the bezel, the height, the look of that awful movement.... Hardly screams omega quality.
Yes, for the price it's not bad, although no one ever pays rrp due to the incessant sales....
I owned 9 CW, now moved on to Omega and Tudor. I got a preowned BB and SMP in mint condition both for less than this watch....
As I said, nice, but answering the question of the headline..... No, no it's not

Комментарий от : @chrisjones6439


@jjraptor84
no sabia que tenias este otro canal espero que siga creciendo felicitaciones
Комментарий от : @jjraptor84



Похожие на видео