Формат | Размер | Скачать |
---|
Название | : | |
Продолжительность | : | |
Пользователь | : | id 847423714214 |
Дата публикации | : | ript src= |
Просмотры | : | layer\/3b96d06c\/www-embed-player.vflset\/www-embed-player.js |
Понравилось | : | 931 |
Не понравилось | : | 60 |
The compact, efficient code of the early days of computing is essentially a lost art. At University of Michigan in the very early '70s, classmates and I were writing Fortran code that we delivered to the computing center (IBM 360 mainframe era) on punchcards. In fewer than 200 instructions, we could simulate the hydraulics downstream of a hydroelectric facility's outlets, or simulate the dynamic response of an automobile suspension to specific roadway and vehicular characteristics. Computing power at the time was VERY expensive, and the wait time to have your program batched into the machine could be many hours - so you learned to write efficient code with error-free syntax, as errors cost you both dollars and wait time. I made many trips to the computing center in the middle of the night, as turnaround was usually much quicker then. Комментарий от : @robevans5222 |
I am stunned that NASA didn't hire the BEST CODER IN THE WORLD to program the Apollo Guidance Computer code. Комментарий от : @Socialdogma |
What about Margaret Hamilton who fixed the problem?! Software Engineer Комментарий от : @jackilynpyzocha662 |
the real 👉🌎human eror👉🌎🐑🐑🐑 Комментарий от : @user-wy5ei7ft9u |
Sounds like the guy being interviewed did a pretty shoddy job. Комментарий от : @Chrishagen |
Because of the space program ,huge advancements in computer technology was made Комментарий от : @lindaeasley5606 |
With all the Hand made, one of a kind , Millions of experimental Parts on Apollo Program. It is amazing it worked out so well. We can do all this today, built in America and only Export. Apollo and these brilliant genius's prove we are the best. Комментарий от : @DIOSpeedDemon |
Hoax lànding on moon 😅 Комментарий от : @Hu9n1689 |
I remember those early days when memory was small and storage was limited. Комментарий от : @JR-bj3uf |
fake story...( apollo 11 press conference ) Комментарий от : @yoskarokuto3553 |
There was not a "computer error"......it did exactly what it was supposed to do...... Комментарий от : @michaelshepherd733 |
Him: No one had written the code to land on the moon before Chatgpt: I wish I was there back then😂 Комментарий от : @desireluminsa5261 |
Funny. This programmer now an old man still believe that something had landed on the moon back in 1969 ... LOL Комментарий от : @hansvetter8653 |
Early in my software career I worked with microcontrollers written in assembly language as a result was forced to create efficient code. From that vantage point it's understandable what the agc engineers were up against. Later using C language the problem returned when programming exceeded available storage requiring streamlining to fit. Комментарий от : @lineshaftrestorations7903 |
classic boomers. walk into the lunar landing lab and get hired without experience. now you have to basically have landed on the moon yourself to get an entre level job. or be a POC woman in stem Комментарий от : @JustinDiazJokes |
There's no way an average email is 75k unless you're counting attachments in which case such an example is frivolous. Комментарий от : @onehotseat |
Bada...moth......er... 🙂 Комментарий от : @peterburman5419 |
It’d never worked. Not more than HAL in The Space Odyssey anyway... Finally in 2025 we will be presented with the truth. I hope... Комментарий от : @oggeeboggee |
Great piece of journalism. Great to hear from that dev himself Комментарий от : @Laminar-Flow |
Why Margaret Hamilton is not mentioned in this video? It's very curious. Комментарий от : @eduardofiolmujica2996 |
Genius. Комментарий от : @thierry-le-frippon |
Interesting how you write about this guy but leave Margaret Hamilton, Presidential Medal of Freedom honoree completely out of the story. If Ms Hamilton had not been there insisting on a fallback asynchronous piece of code the Moon landing would have been a new crater. BTW she was the lead programmer for Apollo.. Oh yeah she was a woman.. so yeah why bother to write about her... Комментарий от : @UKBROOKLYN |
Alternative story tells that Apollo 11 landing was saved by work of team led by Margaret Hamilton that designed the software of Guidance Computer the way it could not be blocked by alarms like 1202. Use of priorities, error detection and recovery, safe restarts assured that despite condition 1202 main guidance algorithm controlling slowdown, approach and final landing were all the time executed correctly Комментарий от : @JanKowalski-vj9py |
Margaret Hamilton????? Комментарий от : @vomoreno |
😎😎😎 Комментарий от : @hanniffydinn6019 |
Don "I hope they weren't using metric in that part of the calculations" Комментарий от : @timypp2894 |
In programming we call it as a FEATURE. Комментарий от : @handle_gc |
High drama in those final moments. I suspect sabotage...and not just this space mission. Комментарий от : @KnightRider872 |
So tell the public why and how NASA lost ALL construction plans of all Apollo missions. Комментарий от : @hansvetter8653 |
Hardly "courageous" on the part of Mission Control. As courageous as a general who sends Others out to to meet their fate. Комментарий от : @PhatLvis |
If Apollo 11 landed on the moon around 50 years ago, why does NASA still has difficulties to re-landed to land on the moon? Комментарий от : @JohnTr5 |
Never forget these both names : - Don Eyles - J. Halcombe Laning 🤠 Комментарий от : @patrickbateman3490 |
He never written a code yet was a good to help land man on the moo . Just shows what human are capable of and ability to adapt and learn when pressed. Комментарий от : @marspalk7611 |
Is NASA's capabilities today is greater than the end of the sixties!
Why did they not return to the moon once? Apollo 11 is the big lie!!!!!! Комментарий от : @FATIEHHSALSHEEMI |
"lapidary" smart dude Комментарий от : @arizonawut |
In the 60s you could walk into MIT not knowing a thing about programming and get put on the moon mission. In 2023 you need a master's degree to make $15 an hour Комментарий от : @GameMageVideos |
Bs Комментарий от : @hughmcnair56 |
Caramba Комментарий от : @denisonpizzato1311 |
Lol. Комментарий от : @jesseazar6848 |
The LEM computer never rebooted. It shedded low priority programs but kept running high priority programs. Комментарий от : @AndrewBlacker-wr2ve |
Last sentence... Yeah, I want my linux computer boot on core rope memory. Instant boot! Комментарий от : @francoisplaniol1489 |
Well how did nasa get through the Allan belts ?? 😂😂😂😂😂 Комментарий от : @LCculater |
A steely eyed missile man. Комментарий от : @BedsitBob |
It’s amazing that Don Eyles, who is responsible for having written most of the computer code for the Apollo 11 LEM landing phase, is not only still alive, but agreed to this interview, to explain what almost caused a disaster for Apollo 11. It was good to hear him say that the code itself was sound, but apparently did not take into account “what if somebody flipped a certain switch that would overload the computer and cause it to reboot at its most critical hour?” It was good for him to have stayed on at MIT to debug the LEM Landing, phase code so that he could write a version 2.0 to that code that would know how to react if that (somebody flips a certain switch that ain’t supposed to be flipped) were to happen again. Whereas had he been fired or quit, a new landing phase code writing committee would have to start from scratch, that would likely increase problems with subsequent Apollo moon landing missions. Комментарий от : @nonelost1 |
Wonderful to highlight Some of the Very Best Unsung Heroes in the Apollo Pyramid Комментарий от : @ginghamt.c.5973 |
Huh, and here I thought that Margaret Hamilton was responsible for writing ALL the code and fixing the bugs all by herself. At least that's what the establishment media has reported. Kudos to this brilliant MAN for being a major part of one of the most important events in history! Комментарий от : @Five2_Bravo |
The version I had heard, was that Buzz had purposely turned on the rendezvous radar, (contrary to how it was rehearsed), so that if they had to abort, they would already be setup to meet back up with Columbia. Комментарий от : @mikem5043 |
0:30 That composure. That's the first man to land on the moon for you. Комментарий от : @GustavoSilva-ny8jc |
why did we not land on the moon even though our computers got faster?.... answer .. We got dumber..🙂 Комментарий от : @adornis0078 |
I don’t get it.. in 1966 he was 23, which makes him today, in 2022, at the age of 89.. video is posted 3 years ago.. you wanna tell me that the man in the video is 85 years old? Комментарий от : @johnnycheng7708 |
The whole so-called "moon landing" was fake, it did not happen. In fact it is impossible to have happened hence in more than 50 years we didn't try again. Yes and we can really trust the Media for the Truth, they are very honest and ethical, they will never lie, just ask George and Tony. Комментарий от : @mosesmanaka8109 |
Awesome, Imagine that writing 32 K of code in a Luna Module Mini Computer to land 2 astronauts and a washing machine on the Moon : ) Комментарий от : @tonyliolio9078 |
Well although it ends on a very ridiculous statement....quite informative Комментарий от : @bobsaget9675 |
Back in the day when you can just ask to be part of NASA Комментарий от : @deathless3518 |
When I worked, I was a hardware engineer. Over the years I have seen the capacity of RAM and ROM memories (Eprom, EEprom, Flash) grow and I have noticed that software engineers who once cared about optimizing lines of code, possibly using the Assembler language, today, with the C language, do not they care more about HW resource saving: it's not a problem anymore and they don't even think about it. However, the consequence is that systems are slower than they could be. On the contrary, the advantage is that programming is easier and faster. Комментарий от : @giovannibaietti2384 |
What a load of bs saying no one knew how to program a computer. The fact they allowed someone with zero computer science background to write the code for a critical part of the program speaks how incompetent the project manager was. Комментарий от : @badweetabix |
6:53 so true Комментарий от : @shahainmanujith2109 |
In 1966 he joined an army of Nazis at Nasa. Комментарий от : @pj1481 |
The reason the LEM computer was rebooting when overheating from the computation-heavy dual radar tasks was due to fault-tolerant programming. It was intentionally designed to preserve itself. If it didn’t flush, shut down and restart it would have burnt-out and then they wouldn’t have had an onboard computer. Комментарий от : @none0such |
¥5.00 to ¥26.00 from $119.99 Комментарий от : @matthewperez9962 |
this is the funniest hoax ever 😂 Комментарий от : @physicalivan |
No man was on the moon. Комментарий от : @michaelmichail9627 |
Genius Комментарий от : @akhandbharth7685 |
"Apollo Program" Producer: Walt Disney deceased at that time. Co-producer: Wernher Von Braun. Director: Stanley Kubrick Art Director: John Hoesli. Writer: Arthur C Clarke. Photographer: Geoffrey Unsworth. Total cost = 169.51 billion current dollars. Комментарий от : @heyneken2156 |
I just realized these are the same people that inspired my grandmother to go into computer science. Комментарий от : @TheTrainmobile |
As a result of Neil doing a manual landing, he flew the lander all the way down to touch down. The computer was going to fly down to ten feet altitude and turn off the engine and let the lander fall slowly to rest. They designed the landing legs to accommodate this shock and collapse several feet. But, when Neil landed so softly, the legs failed to collapse down and left the ladder three feet above the ground. That is why Neil and Buz needed to jump down that last little bit. Комментарий от : @myfavoritemartian1 |
Aldrin stated in a documentary that it was he who caused the condition that set off the program alarms. In his thinking, he felt the rendezvous radar should be left on in case of an abort. But the computer was designed (at MIT) with the basic logic that both the rendezvous and landing radars would never need to be on simultaneously. The extra data from the rendezvous radar gradually overwhelmed the computer memory and caused it to dump and restart several times. Aldrin was being cautious, but didn't know that it would exceed the computer's capacity. Комментарий от : @gt.1984 |
Now in 2022 NASA can’t even send men beyond low earth orbit, because it hasn't developed the necessary technology yet, therefore it's impossible that 50 years ago they sent men to the moon (whih is 500 times farther). Nobody will EVER be able to disprove that, so Apollo guys: Don't reply because it's a waste of time to discuss it and because I don't engage with fraudsters. Комментарий от : @donpettitwedestroyedtheapo6488 |
Sorry, not buying this ...at one point he talks about $36,000 lines of code and then he says 36k like ooh "K ," k for a thousand.... never written line of code and he's writing the code for the moon landing Комментарий от : @ironwood9 |
Total hoax.. Комментарий от : @nigelwilliams9307 |
Me pueden ayudar a subtitular los vídeos al español?? Gracias Комментарий от : @juanmanuelmartinezchavez431 |
Resembles the guy who killed John Lennon. Комментарий от : @randywilson944 |
Very interesting ty for sharing. Комментарий от : @laurelturner129 |
t was an honor to have been the first person to greet them when they splashed down! www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bcajAwdiec&t=10s Комментарий от : @johnwolfram |
Fantasy Комментарий от : @LoneIcon |
0:37 Brad Pitt wrote the code...i knew it.. Комментарий от : @michaelaldan4354 |
only in 1966 can you just walk into an establishment and get a job. Комментарий от : @ggggggggggggggggggggg00000 |
WSJ 🖕🏻 Комментарий от : @phillippitts6294 |
LOL such a boomer moment "I just walked in cold and asked for a job". Imagine walking into Google with zero software dev experience and just asking for a job. These people truly lived in a different time. Комментарий от : @mackdlite5900 |
Anyone else notice he had a sticky note covering his mac camera…? Комментарий от : @hotshotgaming9432 |
Always the same thing... a semicolon was missing 😬 Комментарий от : @jorgetoriz7107 |
Use kubernetes! Комментарий от : @lakshminarasimmanv5559 |
Even the newest computers constantly have glitches in programming or can be hacked. Now they want us to have faith in computer driven cars and crypto currency? They're out of the minds. Комментарий от : @darinjohnson1725 |
Thanks learned a lot! Комментарий от : @niallhamblin |
The real story is that it’s all FAKE. Комментарий от : @Epres144 |
Poor programmer. The stress they go through is appreciated. Coding is the most stressful activity after driving taxi in city traffic. Комментарий от : @ExiledGypsy |
Now the real story of the challenger Комментарий от : @diegotapiasilva7349 |
I don't get it. The possibility of the radar being accidentally turned on was known when the code was written. Code always "does what ir's supposed to do," the question is does it do what we want it to do? This should have been caught in testing. Slipshod. But that's NASA. Комментарий от : @ronrice1931 |
Wow Matt Damon!?! Комментарий от : @EattheApple666 |
Thanks for this very interesting information, I was nine when this took place and remember it well. Amazing achievement. Комментарий от : @paulm159 |
7:12 that's how every serious programmer's table must look Комментарий от : @KodiBrehdon |
1969 Apollo 11 launch were basically a metal tank and a metal capsule (as Neil and other describede) and they launched men onto moon. 2022 NASA is so scare to go back to the moon, can't even get a launch with no human done properly and have to cancel. (Artemis) Don't even care to admit they dare not go to the moon today Said moon and Mars is the upcoming mission but scare till need to do so many stuffs Scare to hire passionate people for the project, only looking at all phd and exremist specialist with 80 pages of resume Everything in this world is improving.. NASA is just a Shame in 2022 because they are not improving infact still scare to launch .. theyy are getting worse.. BTW the phone ure using now have the computing power of the whole lunar mission combine + the enough to compute beside lunar but the whole America for that whole 10+ years period Комментарий от : @xlostlovex |
He had never written a line or code and was offered The job.. Try walking into even the smallest company in 2022 and let them know u hv never written a code.. see what happens.. they will ask u f off immediately and stop wasting their time.. Комментарий от : @xlostlovex |
An amazing story Комментарий от : @horizon42q |
Thank you, WSJ Комментарий от : @davidokeefe1898 |
Everyone at MIT at the time knew it was Don and others who saved the first landing. Naturally NASA took credit as they always do when there’s a success…….and blame the contractor when there’s a failure! Комментарий от : @doriandemaio280 |
Parece muy interesante pero sería posible que que subtitulen en español? Gracias Комментарий от : @juanmanuelmartinezchavez431 |
Is that matt damon Комментарий от : @lagufit |
They keep talking about this new moon launch as if we didn’t ever have a real moon landing, why? Комментарий от : @ronniebishop2496 |
goota make it seem believable Комментарий от : @fernandosanchez6507 |